Chevron: Clean Tech Means More Oil

by Terry Winders - 09.21.09
solar oil extraction

4 reactions

React

Chevron solar

Chevron: Clean Tech Means More Oil

by Terry Winders on 09.21.09

Why it matters:

Chevron has been unabashedly gouging its hungry talons into the Earth in pursuit of profit for decades. Now, in a ghoulish twist, Chevron invests in a solar company that doesn’t create solar energy to use, but helps Chevron pump more oil, faster.

Recap:

Chevron recently invested heavily in a solar energy company called BrightSource. Quoting the NY Times article:

Chevron is an investor in BrightSource, a solar power plant builder based in Oakland, Calif., and solar-powered oil extraction offers the oil giant an opportunity to reduce its carbon footprint while gaining a hedge against volatile natural gas prices.

“It’s potentially a very lucrative market for us,” said Keely Wachs, BrightSource’s senior director of corporate communications.

Commentary:

From the looks of it, Chevron’s venture into sustainable energy may do more to diminish the hopes of a cleaner world then it does to promote it. A clean tech investment born more from economic philandering then economic or environmental necessity yet again proves Chevron’s continued desire to extract and produce every last drop of oil.

Reuters reported that the site would be operational by 2010. This development means two things:

1) Chevron has ingloriously harnessed solar power to do exactly what it does best, at the continued peril of our planet;

2) Chevron will be producing petroleum in a more efficient way then before and will be able to get a tax credit from the government for doing so. An odd twist of fate for a government that has staunchly advocated the development of sustainable energy.

Van Jones predicted this sort of behavior earlier this year when he said:

“”[If] All we do is take out the dirty power system, the dirty power generation in a system and just replace it with some clean stuff, put a solar panel on top of this system. We don’t deal with how we are consuming water, we don’t deal with how we’re treating our other sister and other brother’ species, we don’t deal with toxins, we don’t deal with the way we treat each other, if that’s not a part of this movement, let me tell you what you’ll have. This is all you’ll have. You’ll have solar powered bulldozers, solar powered buzz saws, and biofuel bombers and we’ll be fighting wars over lithium for the batteries instead of oil for the engines and we’ll still have a dead planet. This movement is deeper than a solar panel. Don’t stop there. Don’t stop there. No, we’re going to change the whole system.”

Economically, the development of solar fields by independent solar companies for gas corporations will mean that a greater deal of their income will be coming from the well-healed oil industry. Other companies like Bright Source, Ausra and eSolar for example, might just find it difficult to resist the advances of an industry that still powers the chariots we ride in.

Irony aside, this act does nothing but illustrate Chevron’s intention to remain singularly focused on turning black sludge to green paper.

The sun continues to shine and by 2010 even the oil companies will be harvesting that endless natural energy…to harvest finite toxin-based energy. Brilliant.

Creative Solutions:

  • Share/Bookmark
react

Tweets that mention Chevron Invests in Clean Tech to Extract Oil Faster -- Topsy.com
09.21.09 at 10:15 am
Greenwashing: Downright Deceit — EcoMatters - Green News with Actionable Solutions
11.10.09 at 2:54 pm
Tweets that mention Chevron Invests in Clean Tech to Extract Oil Faster -- Topsy.com 09.22.09 at 4:06 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by EcoMatters and greenREACH. greenREACH said: EcoMatters: New EcoMatter: Chevron Invests in Clean Tech to Extract Oil Faster http://bit.ly/UYXnH #chevron #cru.. http://bit.ly/EcUVt [...]
Sorry… forgot to say great post – can’t wait to read your next one!

Alessandro Machi 09.22.09 at 11:37 am

There may be a bright side to this. Any investment in solar technology probably drives the price down and efficiency up for future projects.

When NASA went to space, many products ended up being developed as a result that we use to this day. Don’t ask me what they are, I forget.

I have advocated not allowing oil profits to purchase oil consuming equipment such as HUMMERS or other ostentatious pieces of energy guzzlers that most people don’t need. However, it supposedly is illegal to tell people how to spend their money, just as it is illegal to force people to use less water in a drought if they can afford to pay their bill no matter how much water they waste.

Oil profits should be being used to increase the efficiency of solar, wind, and hydroelectric energy. If oil profits are instead used to stabilize inefficient and non renweable modes of energy consumption, or to stack the deck with products that just ensure continued dependence on oil, we are going to pay a huge price down the road.

Oil Profits should not be used to continue Oil Addiction. However, investing in a solar company may help us all in the long run, the key is to provide some kind of impetus that gets the oil companies to put more and more of their profits into alternative forms of energy.

Leave a Comment

Twitter Users!
Enter your personal information in the form or sign in with your Twitter account by clicking the button below.

Previous post: Memo to Canada: Keep Your Tar Sands Oil

Next post: Bluefin Tuna: Say Goodbye to Your Favorite Sushi

 

Category 1 Category 1 Category 1